阿郎的故事

剧情片香港1989

主演:周润发  张艾嘉  黄坤玄  吴孟达  王天林  

导演:杜琪峰

 剧照

阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.1阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.2阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.3阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.4阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.5阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.6阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.13阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.14阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.15阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.16阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.17阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.18阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.19阿郎的故事 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2024-06-29 04:10

详细剧情

  阿郎(周润发 饰)年轻时作为出色的赛车手很是放荡不羁,却不妨碍富家女波波(张艾嘉 饰)对其一往情深。波波不顾家人反对,同他结婚并怀下身孕后,发现阿郎背着她还有其它女人,于是愤然离去。波波临盆之际,阿郎参加非法赛车撞死警察入狱。波波被母亲和医生欺骗婴儿夭折,后去了美国生活。出狱后,阿郎为以前行为愧疚,从孤儿院找回儿子取名“波仔”(黄坤玄 饰)。父子二人开始相依为命过日子。  十年后,已有未婚夫的波波回港又遇阿郎,得知波仔是自己的儿子后,想将其带去美国。内心仍深爱波波的阿郎为了证明自己已有彻底改变,决定不顾年纪和身体状况再战赛场。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 阿郎,难忘你的样子

我听到传来的谁的声音
象那梦里呜咽中的小河
我看到远去的谁的步伐
遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
不明白的是为何你情愿
让风尘刻画你的样子
就向早已忘情的世界
曾经拥有你的名字我的声音
那悲歌总会在梦中惊醒
诉说一定哀伤过的往事
那看似满不在乎转过身的
是风干泪眼后萧瑟的影子
不明白的是为何人世间
总不能溶解你的样子
是否来迟了命运的预言
早已写了你的笑容我的心情
不变的你
伫立在茫茫的尘世中
聪明的孩子
提着易碎的灯笼
潇洒的你
将心事化进尘缘中
孤独的孩子
你是造物的恩宠

       每当听到罗大佑这首歌曲,就浮现出阿郎骑着摩托车在赛场驰骋,场外是破镜重圆的波波和疼爱的波仔在朝他挥手,然后阿郎含着微笑,头盔上鲜血直流、朦胧了视线,人和车飞了出去,只留下哭喊的妻儿……这一幕真是重磅催泪弹,看多少遍哭多少遍。

        当千金小姐遇到桀骜不驯放荡不羁的浪子,迸发出电光火石的爱情,他们开着摩托车呼啸穿破深夜接头的寂静。沾花惹草,回家打怀着孩子的老婆,飙车撞死警察入狱,简短的回忆中年轻的阿郎真是很衰。波波被家人欺骗孩子没有了,只身去了美国。出狱以后的阿郎诚心悔改,独自与儿子波仔相依为命,生活清苦但充满欢乐,直到波波重新出现。
        
        波波已拥有一个门当户对的未婚夫,想带儿子会美国,对儿子的未来好,波仔舍不得离开阿郎。阿郎装作很讨厌波仔,将波仔赶走。黄坤玄真是天才童星,那种与父亲的难舍难分让人无法不落泪。波波一想到过去的伤痛,无法接受,准备违心地跟未婚夫带孩子走。阿郎决定重回车坛,比赛中一路领先,波波和波仔回来看他比赛,一个小小的意外发生了开头的一幕。
        
        明明马上就是一个大团圆结局,结果悲剧是多么的令人措手不及。浪子回头金不换,阿郎用十年的用心抚养完成了自我的救赎,却没有福分继续这来之不易的幸福。悲壮的画面,配上《你的样子》,煽情至极。
        
        这部电影我至少看过五遍,最早是在小学的时候,每一次都会落泪,为这份亲情。周润发、张艾嘉、黄坤玄都演得太好,观众的情绪时时刻刻被他们牵动着。多年以后,发现导演居然是枪战片大拿杜琪峰,没想到杜SIR拍这种亲情的电影也这么厉害,真是令人佩服。

 2 ) 男人的样板

当鲜血满面的阿郎驾着赛车风驰电掣冲过终点之后摇摇晃晃摔倒在地的时候
当波仔和波波从一脸的喜悦瞬间转为满脸泪水继而疯狂奔入赛车跑道的时候
当阿郎的脸在赛车爆炸的火光中若隐若现的时候
当罗大佑的"你的样子"再一次在耳边响起的时候
俺起身关了正在努力制冷的空调
尽管室外温度超过35摄氏度
因为
突然俺感到冷极了
这是一种彻底的深入骨髓的寒冷
一种无可名状的悲哀迅速地在体内扩散
......

"人真的不能做错事,做错了一辈子都翻不了身"
"Man should never do thing wrong.Once you do ,game over."
阿郎一脸悔恨在说这句话时
一定不曾想到
有些错事将会用自己的性命来改正
却原来英语台词早已有了提示----Game over!

十年前
波波顶住家庭的压力与阿郎一起生活
可有一天
阿郎亲手打走了已有身孕的波波
波波生下波仔后就远渡重洋
整整十年
阿郎单身一人带着波仔打拼生活
影片讲述的就是十年后阿郎波仔再次遇见波波的情感故事

阿郎一直就不是个好男人
直到当波波提出带波仔去美国的时候
阿郎受到了严峻的考验
有些男人非到关键是看不出其责任心
阿郎就是
处于社会底层的阿郎曾是小混混的阿郎经常在街头飙车的阿郎进过监狱的阿郎
除了身边可爱的波仔
这一辈子真的什么都没有
波仔是他最宝贵的财产
很难想象就是这么个男人
会同意让波波带走波仔
并且在波仔不愿意离开他的时候
狠狠的揍了波仔一顿
硬是把波仔推到波波的身边
......

当波仔哭着闹着寻找老爸最终在赛场上扑到老爸怀里的时候
当阿郎为了波仔的生活重出江湖再次跨上赛车准备赢取这次比赛的时候
当波波明白了什么是十年的父子感情明白谁又深深爱着她决定留下来陪伴阿郎和波仔的时候
....
当一切随人心愿万事如意顺利发展的时候
悲剧发生了
在撞击声爆炸声喊声哭声和一片火光漫天硝烟中
依旧自信乐观阿郎的生命却随着"你的样子"渐渐消逝

我听到传来的谁的声音象那梦里呜咽中的小河
我看到远去的谁的步伐遮住告别时哀伤的眼神
......


若按五星评定法
此片在俺心中是五星
决无疑问

 3 ) 生活安稳就是福

女人要的是安稳,男人却永远晚一步知道 男人和女人及时年龄相当,对待事物也永远存在着差距,女人的心智总是比男人成熟些,当男人拼命耍帅甚至不顾惜自己的身体时,自以为这样可以博得女人的关注,而实际上她只是希望你可以健康平安,不需要酷炫和激情!

不知道为什么看了这部电影最大的感触竟是这些,就像阿郎和波波,当波波已经怀有身孕时,她已经以一个为人母为人妻的角度对待阿郎,对待生活,然而,已经为人父的阿郎却还是那个放荡不羁不肯安稳下来的愣头小子!所以,他得到了教训,而她失去了生活的重心,伤心不已!而多年后再次相遇时,我实在不理解阿郎为什么要通过比赛来证明自己?难道最应该证明的不是如何去做一个合格的丈夫和父亲吗?那些危险极速的挑战真的是女人想要的吗?

虽然对电影的情节有分歧,但周润发的阿郎是我印象中最深刻的一个角色,一直觉得像大哥的小马哥也可以去饰演一个有笑有泪的普通人,前后的反差也诠释的让人跟着心酸,却不失温情!

 4 ) Sean Gilman: All About Ah-Long

//theendofcinema.net/2016/02/01/running-out-of-karma-all-about-ah-long/

Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simple moral reading.

After an auspicious, if commercially unsuccessful, debut with the New Wave wuxiaThe Enigmatic Case in 1980, To spent the early 80s working in Hong Kong television. In 1986 he returned to film working under Raymond Wong Bak-ming at the Cinema City studio, he he made the popular, if not especially distinguished comediesHappy Ghost 3 andSeven Years Itch. These were followed in 1988 by a pair of films, the smash hit farceThe Eighth Happiness and the contemporary crime pictureThe Big Heat. He followed that up in 1989 withAll About Ah-Long,a domestic melodrama that becamethe number one film of the year at the Hong Kong box office, the second year in a row a To film had accomplished that feat.The film reunited To withEighth Happiness star Chow Yun-fat andSeven Years Itchstar Sylvia Chang. Like all of To’s previous four films it was produced by Raymond Wong for Cinema City, but it is a much more dramatically ambitious work. Cinema City at their best was a freewheeling, anarchic studio where anything was possible. The loose atmosphere was responsible for some of the greatest films of the decade (in Hong Kong or otherwise), but also a whole lot of just bizarrely silly nonsense (the Yuen-Woo-ping directedMismatched Couples, for example, in which Yuen tried to make Donnie Yen a star with a breakdancing comedy).The Eighth Happinessexemplified the lunatic side of the studio, an improvisational, tasteless and often hilarious comedy that helped establish the template for a certain type of all-star Lunar New Year comedy (a tradition that continues to this day).

All About Ah-Long, though, is a real movie. Written by stars Chow and Chang (an unusual credit for Chow (his only other story credit is on the 1995 Wai Ka-fai film Peace Hotel), while Chang had already begun the move from movie and pop star to accomplished writer/director), it takes Oscar winnerKramer vs. Kramer as a starting point. Chow plays a construction worker raising his ten year old son, Porky. A former motorcycle racer and drunk, Chow is loud and crude but cares deeply for his kid. When his friend Ng Man-tat (in one of his early dramatic roles, before he became Stephen Chow’s favorite comic foil) gets Porky an audition for a kids’ fashion commercial, they discover that the commercial’s director is Chang, the boy’s mother, returned from America for the first time in a decade. Brief flashbacks fill out the story (Chow was philanderingand abusive and ended up briefly in jail after a motorcycle accident; Chang’s mother hated him and told Chang her son had died after she moved with her to the US), while Chang tries to build a relationship with her son and Chow tries to rekindle his romance with Chang.

It’s an against-type performance from Chow, as arguably the coolest man in cinema in the late-80s dresses down with patched-together clothes and a hideous mop of hair. He’s a deeply flawed man who is completely aware of his faults. Chang is the class opposite: intelligent and reserved, she is the wealth of America, trying to win Porky’s affection with all the things and opportunities she can muster. This is one of the things that distinguishesAh-Long from its American progenitor: whileKramer vs. Kramer paints a complicated picture of 1970s feminism (the breakdown of the home as the wife seeks a life in the workforce),Ah-Longis moreof a class allegory. There’s no expectation that Chang should abandoned her career to be Chow’s housewife, such a thing is unthinkable. However there’s a deep undercurrent of unease with Chang’s cosmopolitan wealth. Both parents want Porky to have all the advantages wealth can confer (education, nutrition, culture, adventure), but there’s an inauthenticity to her world. The film opens with shots of Hong Kong streets, notably not the skyscrapers and businessmen and other conspicuous symbols of the capitalist paradise that was the colony in the late 1980s, but rather of narrow, crowded alleys, packed with shops and debris. It isn’t the gangland slum of the Kowloon Walled City that Johnnie To grew up in, instead it’s a less hyperbolic, more imaginable kind of everyday poverty. Throughout, To will contrast realist images of working class Hong Kong with the glossier sheen of its upper class, mixing aclass-conscious New Wave aesthetic with the pop song montages ofcommercial cinema. When Porky first visits his mother in her hotel (the “Oriental”) he gazes in wonder at the shiny white surfaces, and especially the glass elevator rising infinitely upward at the lobby’s core. Elevators will become a recurring image and location throughout To’s career, a symbol of fear, of entrapment, of the unknown. The image is built upon in a later section ofAh-Long, when Porky and Chang goes to an amusement park and she can’t handle the vertiginous ups and downs of the rides. Porky loves it of course, ping-ponging between highs and lows, but Chang needs to stay on one level: she can’t go back down.

In many ways, Johnnie To’s most recent film is a kind of spiritual sequel toAll About Ah-Long. Reunited with Chow and Chang for the first time in over 20 years, and adapting a play written by Chang,Office is about a pair of young office workers who learn that life at the top of the corporate elevator is more corrupt than they could imagine. Chow and Chang play the oldest couple, the company’s CEO and Owner, long engaged in an amoral struggle for power over each other. A middle couple forms the heart of the film, played by Tang Wei and Eason Chan: Chan is already corrupted, Tang is on her way there. The two share a duet (the film is a musical, with songs by Lo Ta-yu, who also did the music forAll About Ah-Long) where they sing of their hometowns, paradises where there was no ambition. All the corruption of the corporate world is the result of aspiration, of the drive to rise up, to bend and break the rules of conscience in the name of things. Chan is haunted by a recurring nightmare of an elevator: not of falling down an empty shaft, but pointedly being crushed on the ground floor. Porky inAh-Long watches with hope as an elevator rises, Chan cowers in fear as one falls.

I can’t write aboutAll About Ah-Long without addressing it’s ending, so here’s where you can check out if you haven’t seen the film and care about spoilers. Unless I can track down a copy of his two-part TV movieThe Iron Butterfly, the next film in the series with be a New Years comedy reunion with Chow and Chang,The Fun, The Luck and the Tycoon, to be followed by To’s first collaboration with screenwriter Wai-Ka-fai,TheStory of My Son.

Like many a Hong Kong film,All About Ah-Long has a doubleending. David Bordwell writes about the end of the 1987 Chow Yun-fat melodramaAn Autumn’s Tale (directed by Mabel Cheung), where the romantic couple separates at the end, with Chow’s deadbeat failing to win the more upwardly-mobile woman. This is followed by a brief epilogue, set sometime in the future, where the lovers meet again with Chow having miraculously cleaned up his act and become a financial success. Bordwell notes that the multiple, tonally opposite endings work to give the audience a range of ways to react to the film: they get both the happy and tragic endings and therefore a more total experience of melodrama.All About Ah-Long takes the experience to another, emotionally pummeling, level. After a long decline into sadness, where Porky leaves with Chang (with Chow delivering a heart-breakingHarry and the Hendersonsdriving-the-boy-away scene),and then changes his mind and returns to his dad. Chow then decides to race again and gets a haircut and a motorcycle. Father and son head to the Macao Grand Prix, where Chang shows up just as the race is about to start: the family at last will be reunited, with a newly cleaned-up Chow finally worthy of being a husband and father. He races, he’s about to win, and then he crashes. But he gets back on his bike (because that’s what we do), despitea significant head injury (a chance blow from another motorcycle). Summoning all his strength, with intercut shots of his wildly supportivefamily, Chow comes back and wins the race. Porky and Chang leap with joy as Chow, in excruciating slow motion, loses control of his bike and crashes into a wall. He watches his family rush toward him as the motorcycle explodes and he is engulfed in flames. The credits roll over documentary-style slo-mo footage of the wreckage, the horror in the crowd, the anguished faces of mother and son. It’s an astonishing, flabbergasting ending. Such a finale would be unthinkable in a Hollywood movie (can you imagine a film with equivalent-level stars, say Leonardo DiCaprio and Charlize Theron, where the family is just about to get back together but instead Leo dies right at the end? There would be riots in the streets.)

This ending is vital for To’s idea of the film, the sharp, unexpected swerve into tragedy is something he’ll return to again and again in his career. In his interview with Stephen Teo, he says thatAll About Ah-Long was “the first film in which I could line everything up in one go; as the film that was made really from my own thoughts. I am grateful to Chow Yun-fat, who gave me many of his own insights, and also to Sylvia Chang, who actually wrote the treatment and was involved in the production, She disagreed with my ending but I told her I was making the film because of the ending. It may be flawed but I insisted upon it.” The ending is crushing not so much because of its shockingness, although that is certainly a factor, but also because the happier ending that preceded it made so much sense: everything about the surface of the film tells us that this is the kind of movie that will end happily, the two beautiful stars will get back together and their family will be whole. But the ending brings out the darkness, the fear and paranoia that underlies so many of the preceding images, the class contrasts, the vertiginous heights and grimy lows of pre-Handover Hong Kong.The Big Heat too is motivated by an apocalyptic fear of the Handover, as Britain and China agreed that the colony would be handed back to the Mainland, the child’s fate determined by the whims of its parent nations. This strain of paranoia is so present in the Hong Kong cinema of the period that it’s become a critical cliche to remark upon it, like the Cold War dread of 1950s American sci-fi films. Butthere’s an even deeper,more universal fearinAll About Ah-Long, where the paranoia is motivated by diaspora, the promise of wonder in life outside China, but is rooted in a more basic class anxiety: the fear that moving up means becoming inauthentic.

For To and Chow, who grew up relatively impoverished and were now at the pinnacle of their professions, that must have been a very real concern. Chang had a different childhood, born in Taiwan she also spent time in Hong Kong and New York growing up, before dropping out of school to pursue singing and acting at age 16. The film is thus a recreation of the real-life dynamics between the two male auteurs and the female one. It has been pointed out that contrary to expectations in this melodrama the male character is far more emotionally expressive than the female one, with Chow giving a loud, dynamic performance where Chang is cool and internalized (there is a lifelong relationship in a nutshell in a simple eyeroll Chang gives as she sits on the back of Chow’s moped). This is less agender matter though than a class one I think: Chow’s manners are boorish where Chang is refined. The tension between the three artists is vital to the push-pull nature of the melodrama: neither parent is demonized or lionized as the film goes on, both characters are warm and loving to their son, both are full of regrets for their actions a decade earlier (though Chow has more to regret), both want to be forgiving to each other, both know that that is impossible. But ultimately it’s To’s vision that wins out, and it’s a deeply pessimistic one: Ah-Long, a poor but happy man for the first time in his life aspiring to greatness, seeing his dream within reach and then literally exploding. It isn’t a tragic ending, in the sense that it is totally unpredictable: Chow’s fate is determined as much by chance as by any action of his own. There’s always a sense of randomness in To’s tragedies, a kind of contingency that denies any simplemoral reading. Just as inOffice,aspiration ultimately leads to self-destruction, but that destruction can manifest itself in wildly unexpected ways. This black strain, the doom of a universe governed by fate that operates through chance, will surface again and again through To’s career, mixed as it is with farces and romances and stories of brotherhood, moments of liberation and freedom and darkest despair.All About Ah-Long, his first truly great film,is the first to fully express this multiplicity of moods.

 5 ) 风华绝代周润发

不知是第几次看此片。算是最喜欢的老电影之一。
因为知道是怎样的结局,从开头就难过。

1989年的爱情是那样的吗?
年轻人都跳迪斯科,每个人都穿得跟猫王似的。
女孩子头上总要扎个夸张的蝴蝶结。
赛车的,除了受伤就是死掉。活下来的也碌碌无为后半身。
那车上的风光,都是后半生的陪葬。

周润发演的阿郎,张艾嘉演的波波。阿郎看着波波的男朋友一脸的复杂表情,嘴都气歪了。波波的眼里却闪过一丝狡黠的喜悦,又马上故作镇定。不知是否是导演杜琪峰恰好捕捉到。倘若这是张艾嘉的演绎,真是细致到骨子里了。
波仔从出场开始,就让人心疼。虽然短短几天就被冒出来的妈妈用各种物质收买,阿郎给他买的dudu都不看一眼,毕竟是个孩子。可最后,还是哭着喊着要回家。
为什么并不觉得这个剧情很常见呢?这种纯粹的感情现在哪里可以看到呢?
没有父母为了抚养孩子的负担把孩子推来推去;没有女人对男人背叛的仇恨;更没有任何一个人表现出任何自私。

当阿郎大叫着,没有波仔,我就什么都没有了。
当波波大叫着,你以为只有你一个人没有波仔就什么都没有吗?我已经不能生育了。
当阿郎打着波仔赶出门,又躲起来大哭。
当波仔打电话回家哭着问老爸你为什么不理我啊?

他们曾经是那样的深爱着对方,现在只能把这份爱统统转移到波仔身上。除了波仔,似乎没有什么能联系起了。
就如同波波说的,我不恨你,没办法恨,我也没办法再爱你了。怎么可能那么轻易就算了,就和好。你欠我的,我就是没办法释怀。你在我怀孕时候跟别人乱搞,你把我推下楼梯,我怎么可能再跟你生活下去。
阿郎却重新踏上了赛车的道路,那条非死即伤的真理再次被验证。
人出来混,迟早都要还的。

好不容易,波波真实的面对自己的内心,重新回到赛车场。
好不容易,阿郎鼓起勇气,为了带波仔去美国找波波,重新回到赛车场。
好不容易,这一家像是要团圆的样子。
却变成一场撕心裂肺的火光。
于是,什么都没了。

悲剧,原来可以是破镜重圆后再摔碎。

只是,这里面有太多美好。
十年的落魄生活,十年的拉扯孩子。
让人轻易就原谅阿郎,同情阿郎。

最痛该是波波吧。
好不容易有勇气面对爱人了,却眼睁睁看着他丧身车祸与火海。
那双乌溜溜的大眼睛和那张笑脸,却是他再也见不到的了。

“我听到传来的谁的声音,象那梦里呜咽中的小河;
我看到远去的谁的步伐,遮住告别时哀伤的眼神。
不明白的是为何你情愿,让风尘刻画你的样子;
就向早已忘情的世界,曾经拥有你的名字我的声音。
不变的你,伫立在茫茫的尘世中。
聪明的孩子,提着易碎的灯笼。
潇洒的你,将心事化进尘缘中。
孤独的孩子,你是造物的恩宠。”
罗大佑

----
杜琪峰的片子,总是在时装剧里拍出古装的江湖味道。
电影一出来就是灰尘满屏的工地,男神周润发灰头土脸,衣衫凌乱,不过是一名开着变形金刚大土车的工人。岔出一句,年轻时候的玩乐,都要年老的受苦来换取的。可就是男神身上一股浓浓的江湖味让人欲罢不能。
发哥还是少拍满城尽带黄金甲这样的。给他赋予真性情才像那么回事,小马哥、赌神、许文强。发哥,你演没文化却有心肠的真汉子时,真的风华绝代。
原谅我偏爱港片,欢迎与我聊天。

 6 ) 年轻也曾风光过

黄坤玄在《阿郎的故事》里的表演是童星的范本。很多童星只是自持靓和可爱,完全谈不上什么表演。加之成年人写的剧本,行为举止皆是成年角度,让小孩装大人,不是智商欠奉就是非常油条。这部戏里若没有黄坤玄的波仔,周润发的父亲形象也得打一半折扣。波仔正是有点懂,又有点贪玩,又嫌老土又对母亲有向往,还不明白父母的感情多么复杂,写得好也演得好。

吴孟达饰演的角色很重要,波波刚开始以为波仔是他的儿子,吴孟达的表情埋了个伏笔,让后面办公室一场的尴尬水到渠成。而波波的未婚夫的角色就很工具化。

每场戏几乎都有情绪的起伏和反复。波波对阿郎的冷淡,怨恨,但两人一说起儿子又有联结的亲密,阿郎说告诉儿子妈妈已经死了,张艾嘉垂下捻动吸管的手胜过所有语言,对这个男人又气又失望又没办法又可怜他处境。

阿郎是一个曾经挥霍青春的小混混,人到中年陷入一无所有得过且过的窘境,教导儿子上强词夺理,儿子长大之后难保不会看他不起。但若不是周润发怕是演不出这么丰富的层次——骂着脏话,要借钱给烂赌的同事,自己又自由散漫,打儿子又要说对不起,但不懂如何好好道歉,在无力受挫之后靠暴力宣泄。现在莫说找不到周润发这样的演员,剧本都写不出这么层次分明自圆其说的角色,经常是一个扁平的角色靠消耗演员昔日的形象来强行完成角色。

父子情有时更夺人热泪,我们的社会默认男性不具备照顾子女的能力,以及这不是他“分内”的事,所以“特别不容易”。类似题材还有《带子洪郎》,父爱的诠释都是搏命赚钱,也代表无产者突围的一种生勇。而《爱的世界》里的父子是从中产堕入困顿,父亲被不断践踏,最终走向毁灭,更像是恐怖片。

小混混和富家女的故事也是老港片的套路了,婚姻是女性阶级跃升的手段,小混混终究走向毁灭。阿郎的故事可算是天若有情的后续。主流价值观总是希望男女主能破镜重圆,而现实世界却往往过去之心不可得,因此人到中年的阿郎还是要再毁灭一次。多少是受困于中国人太热衷于团圆的形式,希望将来有真正“一国两制”“高度自治”的亲密关系。

时代大不同。现在多半不会信服一个飙车坐牢的小混混能和职业的赛车手同台竞技。《飞驰人生》都得是有污点的前赛车手逆袭,不会是裸露的古典人性对抗高科技车队。韩寒曾写过一篇文章说不要拿自己的业余爱好试图去挑战以此为生的职业人士(虽然他拍电影的这份爱好一上来已经超出不少职人,可见此行业混乱),而在本片所描绘的那个年代,是不少业余爱好者靠勇在往专业化转型的黄金时代,电影电视行业也是如此——规则尚未明确,大批新人涌入,边做边学,时代处在上升阶段,阶层的流动也是可能——地盘工人攒攒钱也有是机会买楼的。

说起这个就不得不提两部根据hk网文改编的短片,一是《公屋·居屋·私楼》,一是其后续《世伯后传》,后传里世伯自陈是给《阿郎的故事》周润发做翻车替身从此落下残疾的那代人,恰恰可以看做是阿郎如果活下去,晚年的境况——沉默的男人。

 短评

最后5分钟的感动

4分钟前
  • 影志
  • 推荐

周润发塑造的这个浪子让人看了就无法忘记,年轻时的放纵疯狂、出祸后的沉默和悔改都被表演的淋漓尽致。

6分钟前
  • 顾俏乜
  • 推荐

很俗套的故事,但是不讨厌

9分钟前
  • 大宸
  • 还行

不记得是多少年前,我看这个电影,大结局的时候,我哭得不成人形

12分钟前
  • 我来我征服
  • 力荐

爱上浪子就像爱上大海,汹涌澎湃一望无际痛快并存。

14分钟前
  • 一只虎耳草
  • 力荐

我不知道如果没有这个令人潸然泪下的结尾,我会给这部电影打几分。但是它有,我也确实被感动了泪流满面,那就五星奉上。

19分钟前
  • 有心打扰
  • 力荐

当年感动得不行.

20分钟前
  • 能工巧匠沙门哥
  • 力荐

乌溜溜的黑眼珠和你的笑脸,怎么也难忘记你容颜的转变。ps,认识"你的样子"就是因为小学时候看过无数次阿郎的片尾曲,那个烈火中的眼神印象太深了。

22分钟前
  • 安蓝·怪伯爵𓆝𓆟𓆜
  • 力荐

孤独的孩子,提着易碎的灯笼。

24分钟前
  • Enjoy_時光機。
  • 推荐

《恋曲1990》、《你的样子》……

29分钟前
  • 想不明白
  • 力荐

话说徐娇真的是星爷按着黄坤玄的样子选出来的?

31分钟前
  • KeneL裤头
  • 推荐

这部电影,最后一幕,当发哥饰演的阿郎,骑着赛车最终冲向终点,却终究因伤势太重,事故爆炸的时候,在场所有人所表现的那种情感张力,那种悲伤,至今仍旧记忆犹新。或许杯具总让人难以忘怀。浪子回头金不换,但有时却付出了生命的代价

34分钟前
  • 吃瓜小能手
  • 力荐

当《你的样子》渐渐响起,眼泪就止不住了~~

39分钟前
  • 战国客
  • 推荐

当放荡不羁的飚车浪子变成了久经生活沧桑的父亲,周润发对底层小人物的深谙,使《阿郎的故事》既有着年少的青春爱情,也有着支离破碎后的亲情羁绊, 那令人意外的悲情渲染,诚然稍显突兀,但一曲浪子悲歌,确也道尽了世间的悲欢离合。

40分钟前
  • 梦里诗书
  • 力荐

结尾比较突兀,人物都很理想化。就是浪子回头金不换嘛。还是值得一看的,不过一直觉得那个时候讲的故事都好简单

41分钟前
  • 九尾黑猫
  • 还行

张艾嘉巅峰时期的好作品。内容俗套但看到最后你会发现自己早已热泪盈眶。

44分钟前
  • 半城风月
  • 力荐

张艾嘉坐在周润发的小摩托后面,《恋曲1990》响起来的时候,太让人泪飚了。

47分钟前
  • mumudancing
  • 推荐

黄坤玄的戏自然的很,恰到好处的好。剧作上写父子情,写浪子回头金不换都非常好,发哥的演绎真棒。

50分钟前
  • Morning
  • 力荐

杜琪峰34岁拍了这个电影,那一年,是1989。今晚,竟然,我是第一次看。不哭,几乎不可能。罗大佑的歌,是最催泪的子弹,最治愈的药。那个时候的香港电影,真是窝心温柔又浪漫逍遥,不怪那时的少年人,都看着港片学做男人。看这种电影的时候,你会觉得自己也是个好人。你以为这很容易,这种好转眼就没。

51分钟前
  • 老晃
  • 推荐

都说浪子回头金不换,那么能拿来交换的只能是性命。

55分钟前
  • 高冷的鸡蛋仔
  • 力荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved