红粉1995

剧情片大陆1995

主演:王姬,王志文,何赛飞,张力维,王若荔,宋秀玲,邢晏春,周剑英,尹继梅,顾芝芬,朱继勇

导演:李少红

播放地址

 剧照

红粉1995 剧照 NO.1红粉1995 剧照 NO.2红粉1995 剧照 NO.3红粉1995 剧照 NO.4红粉1995 剧照 NO.5红粉1995 剧照 NO.6红粉1995 剧照 NO.13红粉1995 剧照 NO.14红粉1995 剧照 NO.15红粉1995 剧照 NO.16红粉1995 剧照 NO.17红粉1995 剧照 NO.18红粉1995 剧照 NO.19红粉1995 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2023-09-05 18:12

详细剧情

  秋仪(王姬 饰)和小萼(何赛飞 饰)本是青楼女子,解放后,她们“这样的”女人被送往了劳动营进行劳动改造,忍受不了劳动营里辛苦的生活,秋仪翻墙逃跑了,身无分文走投无路的她决定投奔自己的老相好蒲家伟(王志文 饰)。  在蒲家伟的家里,秋仪过着寄人篱下的生活,随着时间的推移,她发现本来对自己一往情深的蒲家伟在压力和利益面前,也开始变得言不由衷了,最终,秋仪负气离开了老浦,出家当起了尼姑。让秋仪没有想到的是,蒲家伟竟然和小萼走到了一起,他们不仅结了婚,小萼的腹中亦怀上了蒲家伟的孩子。遭到了昔日好友的背叛,秋仪却并不愤怒。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 红粉

苏童+李少红,柏林银熊,金熊提名,被遗忘的好电影。记得以前看这个片子就特喜欢,时隔多年再看,依旧喜欢。
颠沛的人生,哀伤戳人。喜欢老浦,喜欢秋仪。喜欢王志文、王姬、何赛飞这三个优秀的好演员,情感游韧、韵味十足。喜欢里面的吴侬软语和评弹,还有苏州乡下的老宅。

人的命运真是很奇妙的东西,你无法预知未来,更无从知晓归宿。从感伤的秋仪到唏嘘的老浦,对这部电影前后20年的情感体验竟截然不同。
日子怎么都是过,无论过去、现在,和将来,生活永远都是与你如影随形的空气、阳光和水,多不堪多艰难,也不能不要。放弃了,就什么都没了。命都没了,自尊和脸面还算个什么。

 2 ) 我人生的第一部电影

当年很小 模模糊糊看的
不知道讲什么的,情结我丝毫没有理解,
然而那大段的画面和情结留在我脑海中
清峻的火车道、暗淡的玻璃瓶车间、脂粉气十足的婚礼,
还没被新中国和谐的旗袍、尚存的老资本家、带着锁的红色木柜子、
几个眼神,一把雨伞。

   ----------------------------------
很多年后,读苏童的小说
恍然大悟

我常常在想,建国只是一个时刻性的点儿,可是为什么,在我们的印象和认识中,建国前后,人们生活的气味是截然不同的,在我的脑海中则是无法连接起来。一瞬间,人们的生活的气息发生巨大的改变是不可能的,那么那些一点点发生中的变化,是很吸引我的。这个电影的原著小说,写的是一个片段。




-------------------------------------------

 至今难忘
那时候大概四五岁,除了动画片和闪闪红星之类的片子,
这个应该是我最先接触的文艺类电影。

 3 ) 略论苏童小说的电影改编

十几年前,我在南京上大学的时候,经常去珠江路附近的小毛音像买DVD光碟。小毛音像的老板小毛告诉我,苏童就住在附近,也经常到他店里来买碟。小毛知道我是苏童的“粉丝”,便把苏童买过的DVD光碟推荐给我,我也基本上照单全收了。

从苏童购买的DVD光碟看,他算得上是一位资深影迷,那些传世的艺术电影,他应该大多看过。

多年以后,我在深圳的一次读书活动中见到苏童。我获得提问的机会后,问了他当年在小毛音像买DVD光碟的事情。他回答说,他当年确实经常到小毛音像买DVD光碟,而且,他买的影片,大多是“闷片”。

论一个作家的电影修养的话,苏童在当代作家中绝对是高阶影迷。

在当代作家中,苏童也是“触电”比较多的作家之一,根据其小说改编的影视作品已经有十多部。这些影视作品中,苏童也或多或少参与了编剧工作。

也许因为有着较为接近的成长背景,苏童的小说最受“第五代”(导演)的青睐。《大红灯笼高高挂》(1991,张艺谋导演)、《红粉》(1995,李少红导演)、《茉莉花开》(2004,侯咏导演)等均是“第五代”的作品。同时,这些作品也是改编自苏童小说的影视作品中比较成功的作品。

若从“忠实原著”的角度看,《红粉》是最“佳”作。苏童是南方人,成长于江南水乡,也长期生活于斯,他的小说有着明显的江南韵味。苏童的创作地图颇为广阔,他也会写“北方”的故事,但他最好的作品几乎都是以南方为背景的。《红粉》从故事、人设到环境、氛围,都非常接近原著,而苏童独有的“女性视角”,在李少红手里,也有某种异曲同工之妙。此外,《红粉》还直接使用了小说的篇名作为片名。

侯咏的《茉莉花开》改编自《妇女生活》,在银幕上再现“旧上海”的“妇女生活”,也颇得海派气韵。相比《红粉》,《茉莉花开》更加精致,更加“摩登”,这是二线城市和一线城市的落差,也是女性的细腻与男性的美丽臆想的差别。

从视觉和意象的角度看,《大红灯笼高高挂》是三部作品中改编幅度最大的。《大红灯笼高高挂》改编自小说《妻妾成群》。小说的原名“直接了当”,顾名思义,便可知这是一出“宅斗剧”。张艺谋对小说中的人物和故事都改编不大,但影片中非常重要的“大红灯笼高高挂”的“仪式”,却是张艺谋的“创意”。《妻妾成群》的故事背景应该是在南方,而电影中的故事背景明显换成了北方,大宅、丰雪等,绝对是北方气派、北方气象。《大红灯笼高高挂》虽然没有“忠于原著”,但它的二次创作是极为成功的,在影片中,人物、环境、气息,都是高度融合的。没有张艺谋独到的视觉呈现和意象赋格,《大红灯笼高高挂》不可能成为经典之作。

《大红灯笼高高挂》、《红粉》、《茉莉花开》这三部作品均改编自苏童的“女性小说”。这三部中篇小说也是苏童的代表作,将其视为苏童的“女性三部曲”也无不可。同样,三部影片也可合称为苏童小说电影改编的“女性三部曲”。

在苏童小说改编的电影作品中,《大鸿米店》(1995)、《告诉他们,我乘白鹤去了》(2012)也是比较著名的作品。

黄健中导演的《大鸿米店》因为“尺度很大”(情色、暴力),被雪藏了将近十年,2004年才真正面世。该片改编自苏童的长篇小说《米》。我初中时读这部小说时,也觉得“很黄很暴力”。当时我也是第一次读“尺度”这么大的小说,仿佛发现了新大陆,读完后还跟要好的同学传阅、讨论。时隔数年,当我看到影片时,我其实是比较失望的,因为影片远不如小说生猛——或许,我看到的版本是删减了不少片段的版本。不过,《大鸿米店》这么“三观”不正的影片,现在应该也是拍不出来的了。

《告诉他们,我乘白鹤去了》是由青年导演李睿珺改编的,他的改编“方法”与前辈们大有不同。《告诉他们,我乘白鹤去了》是苏童的一篇短篇小说,简单甚至比较抽象地讲了一个“入土为安”的故事。和张艺谋在故事基础上加入意象相反,李睿珺是取其意象,在影片中大量加入了中国当代农村的生活细节。可以说,《告诉他们,我乘白鹤去了》的主题、概念和意象主要来自于苏童的小说,而影片中的生活场景和故事细节,主要是李睿珺的二次创作——如此,我们才能在影片中看到了鲜活的日常和真切的人物。

《大红灯笼高高挂》和《告诉他们,我乘白鹤去了》都是偏离了常规改编方法的影片,但导演强大的创作能力却赋予了影片自成一体的面貌。在我看来,这两部不走寻常路的改编作品,恰好是苏童小说改编的电影作品中的最佳之作。

香港的摄影大师、“三级片”殿堂级导演何藩也曾改编过苏童的小说,那便是1994年的《罂粟》。该片改编自《罂粟之家》,是《米》之外的苏童的另一部关于“压抑”与“欲望”的“大尺度”作品。当年初尝“禁果”时,我很喜欢苏童的“压抑”与“欲望”系小说,但如今回想起来,觉得苏童的这类小说其实挺猎奇的,文学价值其实没有那么高。何藩在图片摄影方面,是顶级大师,他也在“三级片”中展现了他的摄影修养,但他的叙事能力确实有点“捉襟见肘”,《罂粟》最终只是一部“噱头”之作。

苏童是一位非常勤奋的作家,成名后一直笔耕不辍。作为一位讲故事的高手,苏童的文学宝库仍有待更多的影视创作者去深入挖掘。

 4 ) 往事无人知晓

李少红的《红粉》拍得还是不错的。 王志文当真是英俊潇洒的浪荡公子。看苏童的原著时,还没把老浦这个称呼往漂亮的皮相上想。他和秋仪的那段耳鬓厮磨的戏实在太迷人了。 有影评说后半段的情节有些突兀,如老浦怎么就贪污被枪毙了,小萼和他的那场声嘶力竭的争执也和前面不搭,等等。我倒是没觉得生硬,要知道,这部电影是有大片留白的。 不,说留白还不准确。电影中那些烟雾缭绕的场景,言说了一切:他和她,还有她,都是上一个时代留下来的人。 军装配枪的士兵们成编制地开过来了,要把风尘女们送往教养院。鱼贯而行的女人们被指挥着,往这边走,往那边走。这时候秋仪出来了,穿旗袍、披着大衣,倚在门边,向上拉一拉大腿上的丝袜,又买了个烧饼,“死刑犯还要吃一顿饱饭呢”,她说。上船的路有一处没有接驳,底下是河,要用力地迈过去。扶我一下呀,她对旁边的兵说。男解放军战士一言不发,也不看她,只是搬了个长条板子,那边留着齐耳短发的女战士意味不明地看了她一眼。 他们是新的人,来自另一个地方、另一个社会、另一个时代,身上有一种对她们而言完全陌生的气质。 那种陌生感还该多加渲染才是。所以电影的确有所不足:新的社会不只意味着口号,而是断裂和撕扯,是无法躲避的改天换地。像雾一样慢慢遮住西餐社和舞厅灯牌,各种颜色的洋装变成灰扑扑的列宁装,旧的人们发现日子一天天变得奇怪。 新的时代和社会对他们而言,仿佛一首听不见的曲子。原著的结尾其实正是点睛之笔,片中却并未有所表,似为一憾。因为它正好呼应了片名「红粉」:冯新华,即小萼和老浦的儿子长到八九岁的时候,一天偶然发现了一只粉盒,正是他生母的。秋仪,他的母亲,拿走了那个不相干的杂物,并说男孩子不要玩这种东西。后来也没有人告诉他,他的身世如何,他不知道自己生父和生母的故事,不知道生父给他起过一个奇怪的名字叫悲夫。 他是生在解放后的,他叫冯新华。他不知道那盒红粉的故事。

 5 ) Self-negation and the Redistribution of Body

Laopu/landlord Huang Shiren (黄世仁) is on the stage, accused by the ghostlike white-haired girl. Ghost or human, Laopu touches this ambiguous terrain no less than the accuser in a dramatic moment. Acting as a role he once belonged to in a broad sense of class, Laopu joins the trend initially against himself. Huang Shiren is chanting the political slogans with the audiences against himself and suddenly feels something wrong. Allegorically, this points to Laopu, who should have yet doesn’t feel anything wrong. What unravels here is the logic of self-negation in the phase of social transformation, which must be internalized and self-adapted in order not to always feel something wrong.

The logic of self-negation is for all, who and which are relegated to the remnants of the dark old society but are still retained the chances to regenerate, partially for the evocation of a reshaped subjectivity, and partially for the demonstration of a promiseful de-oppressive regime. The “labor camp” for the prostitutes is one of the apparatuses of this logic. In a closely watched space, former prostitutes are deprived of the right to live as before and even, the right to die, yet are endowed a self-supporting and dignified future life. The enforced space itself has already indicated that these women are taken as corrigible vermin, although they are ironically taught to ascribe their “sins” to the brothel madam or social mechanism other than the degrading fate during the pedagogy of “speaking bitterness”. In other words, the labor camp is designed to erase the structural inscriptions of the feudal or capitalist society on the body and spirit of the prostitutes, but at a cost of implicitly duplicating the prejudices to them and negating all their past, their personal history except a good nature that hasn’t decayed totally. I’m not denying the seminal impact of this discipline, especially the redistribution of body, from the haircut, physical examination, regular routine and factory labor—every motion, every form or sign is politically considered--, which transforms the objectified body “for play” or “for sale” to the autonomous body for socialist construction. Indeed, life is not so bad for some of these reformed women. Nevertheless, I have to point out two problems remained. First, how can we really distinguish the transformed body, the labor in the factory with the capitalist production that reduces human to machine? The great will of working for socialism or the bright scene in which these seemingly free women are running through the rape flower fields cannot explain all. Second, the pedagogical apparatus and public opinion push the former prostitutes to thorough self-negation, which reduces their past to nothing or dirtiness. For instance, in a scene Xiao’e is irritated by a forewoman who suggests the money she made before was “unclean”, and as a counterpunch Xiao’e declares that money is all the same and call her names later. That’s how the traditional discrimination for prostitutes slips into the conjuncture of the new logic of self-negation. “Unclean”, this is a too rough generalization for the complicated situation of subjectivity and feelings of the prostitutes. To some extent, strategically, it is precisely this kind of thorough negation that leads to the impossibility of the reformation, because no room for the past, no empirical agreement for the future.

Back to the specific details in the movie, I want to future stress the bifurcate of Qiuyi and Xiao’e: For Xiao’e, does the labor camp really change something? (Also, we don’t know whether the former prostitutes are married to the former clients.) Or rather, is the self-negation effective on her? For Qiuyi, escaping from the negating process of the labor camp qua an entrance to a new social life, what is left for her in the society? We see another direction of redistribution of body— To take tonsure, give up her hair that is cherished as a feminine character (versus the haircut of the disciplined ones) and become a nun. But where she comes back to at last is still the symbolic position of Laopu’s embrace, the only position having something to do with an acceptable past.

 6 ) 来自歷史學家贺萧(Gail Hershatter)的評論

Gail Hershatter, Dangerous Pleasures: Prostitution and Modernity in. Twentieth- Century Shanghai. Berkeley: University of California Press,. 1997. xii + 591 pp.

原書396-8頁,翻譯本《危險的愉悅》409-11頁。

Moving into politically more volatile territory, the 1994 film Blush (Hong fen), by the renowned woman director Li Shaohong, offered an oblique comment on the limited success of the 195os campaign to reform prostitutes. In the film's opening sequence, Qiuyi and Xiao'e, two Suzhou courtesans, are rounded up for reform. Disdainful of the entire process, Qiuyi stops to purchase a sweet potato, commenting that "even a condemned man gets a last meal." She escapes from the reform institute immediately upon arrival and goes to live with one of her customers, a gilded youth named Lao Pu. Xiao'e remains incarcerated. Frustrated by the hard work of bowing cotton in the institute factory, she tries unsuccessfully to hang herself.

In one of the film's most interesting moments, Xiao'e's political instructor urges her to tell her "classmates" that she attempted suicide because she was worn down by the oppression and exploitation of her past life as a pros- titute. Without directly contradicting the instructor, Xiao'e makes it clear that it is not the past that troubles her: rather, she is afraid of the future, exhausted by the work, and uncomfortable because of blisters on her hands. Undaunted by Xiao'e's refusal to draw the proper political conclusions, the instructor then goes on to tearfully recount what is apparently her own story. She is the daughter of a prostitute who sacrificed to put her through university, yet it has taken her many years to get over her shame at her mother's occupation and to appreciate her efforts. Communist reformers are not pilloried or satirized in this account-in fact, the reform campaign is treated sympathetically--but it is clear that the attempt to impose a single narrative of oppression on a heterogeneous group of women is doomed to fail.

The remainder of the plot (which is based on a story by the popular young male writer SuTong) is worthy of a first-class soap opera. Like SuTong's story Raise the Red Lantern, which became a prize-winning film by Zhang Yimou, Blush contains enough inconsistencies and problems to annoy feminists, historians, and assorted other viewers. Qiuyi's liaison with Lao Pu during her stay in his family's house is incoherent: the two use each other mercilessly in an exchange of protection for sexual pleasure, then suddenly and inex- plicably discover their undying love for each other long after the liaison has ended. By that time Qiuyi has left Lao Pu in a fit ofpique, become a Buddhist nun, discovered she is pregnant with Lao Pu's child, miscarried, and mar- ried an older teahouse keeper whom she does not love. Meanwhile, Xiao'e is released from the reform institute, works briefly in a factory, quarrels with a woman who implies that she is still a prostitute, and marries Lao Pu. In the process she metamorphoses rapidly from petulant prostitute to sweet young worker and back. Xiao'e and Lao Pu are unhappy together; they fight continually about money, and Xiao'e exhibits what the reformers would undoubtedly call an unreconstructed courtesan's mentality, demanding material goods and throwing tantrums.

Ultimately, Blush is not a story about reform at all. Rather, the author and filmmaker regard the 195os reform efforts as a safely distant treasure trove oflong-ago times, to be mined for interesting dramatic material rather than contemporary political lessons. And the film's success-it won the Silver Bear award at the 1995 Berlin Film Festival-suggests that such material will find a receptive audience in the international artistic realm as well.

In these late twentieth-century reconstitutions of the past, prostitutes were multiply deployed: as figures in Republican China's interconnected social ills, as important historical figures who contributed to the nation's cultural heritage, as worthy subjects of elite male observation and writing, as exemplars of traditional female virtue, as sites of nostalgia and popular entertainment, as subjects incompletely reformed by the state. But perhaps something more was promised as well. As the editor's introduction to the reprint of Hell on Earth explained, "Through this book, longtime Shanghai residents can arouse their childhood memories; young people can see the bizarre and motley character of old Shanghai, and sense the health and prosperity of new Shanghai; social historians can find material they need; psychologists can rely on it to research the particular states of mind of the people who were active in those circles; linguists can make use ofit to investigate changes in Shanghai dialect."18 The reissue of courtesan novels was meant not only to facilitate research, but also to restimulate individual memories that might well have been buried under the state's master narrative of twentieth-century history. At the same time, although the introduction expressed the pious hope that young people would appreciate the contrast between the bad old days and the healthy present, the book itselfaimed to make available to them a textured and colorful body of knowledge about the past, one that they might well use to fashion their own understanding so fold Shanghai, of their own heritage, of their own Chineseness. Prostitutes were important figures in this reach for a new and improved past, making it likely that the meanings of prostitution will continue to be re-created and negotiated in China as elsewhere.

 短评

唉,人啊!反射弧太短,反应太快,很可能走错路;反射弧太长,反应太慢,更可能走错路;随大流吧,看运气漂吧,鬼知道会混成个什么德行?脑回路奇特,来一次跳跃式发展,又很可能摔死。主动些吧,很可能自作自受,自找苦吃;被动接受吧,很可能掉进陷阱,永不超生。出世吧,尘缘难了;还俗吧,无立锥之地。怎么就是瞎折腾,不能好好过日子呢!

8分钟前
  • HD
  • 力荐

喜歡小說多於電影。女性角色耀眼,但男性角色更能突出中國人的特性:軟弱,長期在父母權威下不敢自己做主,只能通過女人和一時激情去做出看似果斷,實際逃的決定。面對無法處理的局面,依然選擇逃避式的選擇,所以命運是導向死路一條。

12分钟前
  • 小黄兔
  • 还行

故事好,拍的也好。冷静得不像女导演,这就是李少红。故事可大可小,大的方面很深刻,小的方面人性方面更深刻。男女关系真是亘古不变。女人的爱分两种,一种爱到深处说不出口,一种为了生活机关算尽。三位主演都太好太好了。王姬有一种贝蒂·戴维斯的冷静果断,王志文声音也太苏了。何赛飞美!

17分钟前
  • 红皇后
  • 力荐

鉴于李少红的导演记录 看下来这算她比较靠谱的片子了 很浓的吴地风情 也基本忠于原著 变化多在于场景与禁忌台词上 所以讲完全没小说味也大可不必 毕竟文学作品不是剧本无法复现 在改编上 最后让秋仪与老浦见面 以及老浦的补偿 比原著多了份人情味 也少了哀戚与凌冽 主演们都不错 加分

22分钟前
  • 爱茉绿绿
  • 推荐

同时期,国内有很多佳作登场,本片却只能算是一部徒有其表的佳作,虽然忠于原著,但删减和修改了神韵,就没有了灵魂。……大量的留白,导致3个演员越卖力,却和原著所表达的渐渐偏离。就如《亮剑》小说和电视剧的区别,小说看的痛哭流涕,电视剧看的热血沸腾。……如果是姜文和刘晓庆来拍,又会是如何?……王姬的秋怡太作了,反而王志文和何赛飞很出彩。……导演李少红,她拍戏一直都有她独特的表达方式,“鬼”气太重。好在本片没有。突然想起了她导演的《红楼梦》和本片一样,也是剧情+旁边,第五代导演当中,也算是个另类。……苏童的原著可能受到日本电影《望乡》的影响。

26分钟前
  • 君心可晴
  • 还行

王志文老师的声音是真好听啊!没有刻意拍江南,但是那一口吴语,不经意的评弹,却比现在刻意为之的江南更江南~何赛飞老师年轻时真的是娇憨,太喜欢了!王姬老师攻气啊攻气,啊最后一起奶孩子好百合!彩蛋是第一编剧是倪震!旁白娓娓道来也好听!

28分钟前
  • momo
  • 还行

大约二十年前,买过《红粉》的正版铁盒VCD,不想碟片不能播放。念念不忘二十年,终于看了。老浦小萼吵架一场,太有感触,若是二十年前看,肯定是无感的。王志文演得真好,优雅而懦弱,被时代迫害的良好市民。

33分钟前
  • Clyde
  • 推荐

这真是一场风花雪月的事,婊子有情,男有义,没有太多的矫情腻歪,在情色、利益之间,处处闪烁着温柔动人的光辉,这不是爱情,什么又是爱情呢?相比于《姐姐妹妹站起来》的旧社会妓女改造,此片没有把这帮妓女们往苦大仇深里刻画。事实上,高级妓女的生活其实很好,尤其是过惯了纸醉金迷的日子,一时劳动改造,反而不适应,甚至会怀念从前的时光。毕竟她们年轻,经历过“五陵年少争缠头”的风华正茂,却尚没经历“暮去朝来颜色故”的郁闷。秋仪逃离了,本来她可与蒲家伟成婚,可是因为是真爱,所以较真,而这一较真,将蒲家伟拱手相让于小鄂。小鄂是典型的婊子形象,无情无义,只谈利益,当蒲家伟无利可图时,便怨声载道。蒲家伟死于多情,死于善良。电影意欲告诉我们,这世间的真爱往往徒留遗憾。

35分钟前
  • 小袁同学
  • 推荐

赛人正巧今日话了《红粉》,还是引用他一段吧;人比人得死,货比货得扔,还是李少红的这版略好些,假不假江南水乡的韵致还是出来了。苏童写了那么多女人,但写得最好的还是男人。又或者在他笔下摇曳生姿的女人,只能在男性的目光里才能展现欢颜或暴露愁容,这些女人很少有独处的时候。而苏童笔下的男人往往一个人就能去寻欢作乐。我的建议是,《红粉》要重拍的话,还是找男导演更合适一些。那点小猥琐带来的小可怜,女性很难体会。《红粉》要说的是什么呢,妓女这一古老的行业,除了阶级压迫之外,还有些不易总结的内容,在驱使着这一职业女性花自飘零水自流。时代在变,但总有些事物,像苏州小桥下的流水,自顾自的蜿蜒,谁也控制不了它的流速,也不知道它究竟会流向何处。

38分钟前
  • 祝老六
  • 力荐

豆瓣的劇情簡介寫得太糟糕。秋儀是大女人,在現實中大女人總是被男人“犧牲”掉的那個。老浦去拍庵門,大雨沒傘;秋儀辦完父親喪事拍庵門,大雨沒傘,他們都是沒有庇護的人。傘出現三次:慶婚、送刑、片尾秋儀給小萼送熱湯——她完成了自我建設,足夠強大,甚至成為他人的庇護。

39分钟前
  • 巴珍
  • 还行

想必李少红心中有更合适的演员,但这三个人应该是当时最红的明星了。看小说的时候我带入了一下十年前的郝蕾和霍思燕,现在的倪妮和周冬雨,还蛮有趣的。

40分钟前
  • 方方在努力
  • 还行

每一次都感慨,中国再也拍不出这么好的电影了。扎实的原著,牛逼的剧本。三个那么优秀的演员,和李少红导演的正当风华时。故事节奏取舍大胆,细节又丰沛,情感的收放和表达都很戳人。而对于历史和人性的还原鲜有批判,但力道十足。

44分钟前
  • 华盛顿樱桃树
  • 推荐

想不出谁比何赛飞更适合这个角色。

45分钟前
  • 大帆茄
  • 推荐

《红粉》电影的美术还原性做得相当好,解放初期的江南水乡的小城。木结构的小阁楼,邻水而起的脏的几乎看不出是黑瓦白墙的斗拱建筑,拾阶而下倒马桶的妇女,雨色中弯曲而去的青石板路面的小巷;以及解放后贴的可哪都是膏药般的标语、三俩的黄军装的正气凛然不断审视你的眼神、氤氲评弹软语中,突然爆出的大嗓门口号、一本正经的关怀,呵斥的口吻,从岸边上船时,秋仪伸手要解放军战士搀她一把,解放军小战士一言不发,给他搭了条木板。像这样的细节,太精彩,可惜真的太少了。电影给三个优秀的演员扎好了舞台,他们仨演的都本儿好,本儿卖力气,美术做得也好,置景服装美术都到位,也有时代的一些背景音色。大概可惜就是,好像差些时代交织的更鲜明更锋利更具有隐喻性的冲突,不管是情节的还是内心的,还是寓意的,差拱火。悲夫者,不过是逝者如斯罢了。

48分钟前
  • 嗦罗蜜
  • 推荐

秋仪出家,是想寻求一个心灵支撑——她的生活倾覆了,以为可以依靠的男人也退缩了,她无处可去,想要留在寺庙。然而寺庙也不留她,幸好她一直是坚韧的,最终在红尘中找到栖身之所。可惜小萼没有认清形势,虽然经历了劳动改造、工厂做工,她始终如菟丝花一般无法自立,最后毁了老浦,也毁了自己本可拥有的平静生活。当然,是老浦选择了小萼,而不是秋仪。因为小萼柔弱又可爱,他的男人气概可以在她面前展现——相比之下,秋仪略显刚强了。既然他选择了“傻白甜”,就要为“傻白甜”买单。

49分钟前
  • nydzy
  • 推荐

太好看了,红粉—女人的一生!镜头真美,王志文演得真好,让人开始反思话语体系和权力体系下的个体:一夜取消昌既行业,她们的生计成了问题,全部转入棉纺教养;一夜转变规则,没收土地,按成分处理;刚结放,需要你们的田产支持,你们需要自力更生;家伟,秋仪和小萼的命运令人唏嘘,权力和规则转变,小萼柔韧的适应,秋仪倔强的碰撞,家伟的求取生存;艰辛生活下的个体挣扎,家庭争扰,互相埋怨,外部压力转为家庭战争——人的生存压力,是家庭争吵的主要来源,只要能解决掉个体的生存压力和家庭的生活压力,那么家庭问题一定会少很多;人的一生事就那么多,也就那么几个,两个人里有一个有问题,那么双方关系就会承压,问题也会接踵而至,确保双方能承受和化解各自的压力不抱怨和归咎对方很重要,爱必然是在此之上才能维持,不然就是无尽的争吵和不安

52分钟前
  • 大罗
  • 力荐

南方湿漉漉的,风情万种,拍得蛮好,普通话配音也不影响,如果是上海话配字幕应该更佳。。直到90年代中期国产电影都还过得去,到了现在,一年也出不了两部佳片

53分钟前
  • 一只野鸡
  • 推荐

如果我没看过黄蜀芹版的红粉我可能会打个四星。扣掉的一星是过于浪漫化的处理,遮蔽了“历史”的暴力,另一星还是过于浪漫化的处理,使本该特立独行的女性陷于与一个原著中本是懦弱无能却被改写成痴情的有担当的男性的情爱世界里。任何改编小说的电影都多多少少会加上一些罗曼蒂克色彩,毕竟是资本操控。和教授讨论的时候,我说我更欣赏小萼,即使她好吃懒做,但是她从来不否认自己的好吃懒做,不掩饰欲望,管它世界翻天覆地怎样的发生变化我只追求我的,什么伦理道德抚养后代对她来说不是义务,不是枷锁。在女性依然被父权伦理道德,母性神话束缚的今天,不得不说她是一种意义上的女权。

54分钟前
  • 海苔
  • 还行

比上一年相似题材的《红尘》好太多。用空间和构图反映人物的境遇。很工整,处理得也老练。几乎每个场景都有言外之意。妓女解放后进的是弹棉花的工厂,背景音和团团弹起的棉花照应内心的不安;何赛飞在工厂往竹架上挂折扇,摇摇欲坠的画面感暗示接下来的命运;秋怡跳窗逃跑,给的是层层叠叠的屋顶的远景,只有薄薄的瓦片,没有路;地主老宅的前景走过蹒跚的老妪;两个女人在高墙下的窄巷子会面;秋怡结婚的话外音配的画面是秋怡走下台阶到水边倒马桶。王志文演得真好。

59分钟前
  • 艾弗砷
  • 推荐

6/10。充满意味的空间造型来达到集中展现矛盾这一目的,曲径通幽、封闭的天井楼厢限制了女性生存,开头解放军搭在船与岸之间的木板象征她俩无法改变命运道路,阴雨和伞的意象铺设了情感悲剧,给老浦侄子画胭脂水粉、削发为尼两场戏显露秋仪心软和决绝两面;硬伤是旁白未能准确结合影片情绪又弱化冲突。

1小时前
  • 火娃
  • 还行

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved